blow the whistle
$show the love

  • register for email updates

  • Loading...Loading...


  • let the records reflect

    No ‘magic shield’ protects agencies targeted by investigators

     

    A blog about public records …

    By JIM WALLS

    Hil

    Exactly three years ago today, I requested records of credit card statements for former Clayton County Sheriff Victor Hill. A week or two later, after someone let it slip that the sheriff’s office had a bank account that other county officials didn’t know about, I asked for those records too.

    I’m still waiting. Legally, though, there’s no valid reason that I should be.

    I ran across some of the relevant emails this week just as news was breaking that Hill might be indicted soon for theft, racketeering and other allegations. He’s been told a grand jury will meet Jan. 18 to consider the charges.

    Back in 2009, Clayton County officials were preparing to release the credit card statements and related documents that I requested. Then they decided they weren’t, citing a pending investigation into Hill’s use of public funds.

    Georgia law allows “law enforcement, prosecution, or regulatory agencies” to keep case files confidential in investigations of criminal or unlawful conduct. There is no such protection, though, for records that are kept as a matter of routine by agencies doing the public’s business — even if that business becomes the subject of a criminal investigation.

    Lawyers who work with the Open Records Act a lot — including media lawyers and the Georgia attorney general’s office — understand this principle. But try telling that to a government official who’s looking for a reason to keep records from becoming public.

    In 2009, I tried the Clayton County sheriff’s office, the finance department, the county attorney and the county commission’s chief of staff to see what Hill had been charging to the county. I got squat.

    Clayton County’s not the only local jurisdiction abusing the investigative exemption. Atlanta Public Schools tried it recently during the CRCT cheating scandal and, eight years ago, when the feds found the system had squandered millions of dollars in technology money. Fulton County cited the same exemption last year after an internal investigation found $183,000 in credit card charges that benefited a few employees and their event-planning business.

    Attorney General Sam Olens’ office takes the position that the law does not protect agencies that are under investigation from producing documents. But, senior assistant attorney general Stefan Ritter told me today, “Some local governments do not always agree with our interpretation.”

    The exemption is meant to prevent investigators from being forced to produce files on open cases. Even then, that protection only applies an agency has an investigative duty as part of its mission, Ritter said.

    “The target of the investigation is not allowed to use the investigative exception as some sort of magic shield,” he said.

    But they do anyway — and they’ll keep doing it — if we let them.

     

    ###

     

     

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

     

    5 Responses to “No ‘magic shield’ protects agencies targeted by investigators”

    1. lynnbo says:

      Great story about how things really work, hope it makes it on the front page!
      FYI Hall County Sheriffs office is under DOJ investigation and two employees have been arrested. Its interesting because this is where many leaders in GA reside. Gov. Lt. Gov. and various GA Legislature leaders.

    2. John says:

      The corruption level around the state is unbelievable. The investigative exception is used all the time to block anyone from knowing what is going on, especially in the more rural areas, which don’t particularly think laws apply to them.

    3. Denise Caldon says:

      This “magic shield” is statewide in our state government. Below is the statement made in the State Office of Inspector General Office’s (OIG) investigation of serious issues by the top administration at Macon State College: “The evidence/conclusions disclosed in this report may have been limited by evidence including (email, computer files, etc.) that was no longer available at the time of the investigation; or due to certain facts and circumstances not being divulged by those who were investigated.” Yet, the OIG never asked them “where are the documents?” Most of the documents in my Whistleblower case are kept sealed by our state’s Attorney General Sam Olens – the Board of Regents’ attorney – in a Protective Order in Fulton County Superior Court. I have copies of all and have been encouraged by a legislator to go ahead and release them. I am seriously considering it.

    4. John says:

      I tried to meet with Sam regarding specific cases where this is happening at a fairly egregious levels and was told it was “out of his jurisdiction.”

    5. Michele says:

      The problem in GA is the people are too stuck on party to understand that corruptions crosses all lines and needs to end. All one has to do is look at Gov. BAD DEAL and the rest of the legislators are in bed with these lobbyist. Its up to the people to correct this but this state is so divisive they would vote against their own interest rather than do what is right. There is not enough noise and not enough coverage on all of the corruption for I do not intend the mainstream media to participate in outing these crooks, it is up to blogs like this and people who are concerned about their rights.

    Leave a Comment